Moosmann J., Ershov A., Weinhardt V., Baumbach T., Prasad M.S., Labonne C., Xiao X., Kashef J., Hofmann R.
in Nature Protocols, 9 (2014) 294-304. DOI:10.1038/nprot.2014.033
Abstract
X-ray phase-contrast microtomography (XPCμT) is a label-free, high-resolution imaging modality for analyzing early development of vertebrate embryos in vivo by using time-lapse sequences of 3D volumes. Here we provide a detailed protocol for applying this technique to study gastrulation in Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog) embryos. In contrast to μMRI, XPCμT images optically opaque embryos with subminute temporal and micrometer-range spatial resolution. We describe sample preparation, culture and suspension of embryos, tomographic imaging with a typical duration of 2 h (gastrulation and neurulation stages), intricacies of image pre-processing, phase retrieval, tomographic reconstruction, segmentation and motion analysis. Moreover, we briefly discuss our present understanding of X-ray dose effects (heat load and radiolysis), and we outline how to optimize the experimental configuration with respect to X-ray energy, photon flux density, sample-detector distance, exposure time per tomographic projection, numbers of projections and time-lapse intervals. The protocol requires an interdisciplinary effort of developmental biologists for sample preparation and data interpretation, X-ray physicists for planning and performing the experiment and applied mathematicians/computer scientists/physicists for data processing and analysis. Sample preparation requires 9-48 h, depending on the stage of development to be studied. Data acquisition takes 2-3 h per tomographic time-lapse sequence. Data processing and analysis requires a further 2 weeks, depending on the availability of computing power and the amount of detail required to address a given scientific problem. © 2014 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.
Carotenuto R.et al.: Survival fraction and phenotype alterations of Xenopus laevis embryos at 3 Gy, 150 kV X-ray irradiation in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 480 (2016) 580-585.
Sun F.et al.: Investigation of failure mechanisms in silicon based half cells during the first cycle by micro X-ray tomography and radiography in Journal of Power Sources, 321 (2016) 174-184.
Gorodzha S.et al.: High-resolution synchrotron X-ray analysis of bioglass-enriched hydrogels in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part A, 104 (2016) 1194-1201.
Sun F.et al.: Three-Dimensional Visualization of Gas Evolution and Channel Formation inside a Lithium-Ion Battery in ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 8 (2016) 7156-7164.
Hofmann R.et al.: Gauging low-dose X-ray phase-contrast imaging at a single and large propagation distance in Optics Express, 24 (2016) 4331-4348.
Scott C.et al.: High dose efficiency, ultra-high resolution amorphous selenium/CMOS hybrid digital X-ray imager in Technical Digest – International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM, 2016-February (2016) 30.6.1-30.6.4 7409803.
Medina-Sánchez M.et al.: Cellular Cargo Delivery: Toward Assisted Fertilization by Sperm-Carrying Micromotors in Nano Letters, 16 (2016) 555-561.
McLennan R.et al.: VEGF signals induce trailblazer cell identity that drives neural crest migration in Developmental Biology, 407 (2015) 12-25.
Yang X.et al.: TV-based conjugate gradient method and discrete L-curve for few-view CT reconstruction of X-ray in vivo data in Optics Express, 23 (2015) 5368-5387.
Rolo T.et al.: In vivo X-ray cine-tomography for tracking morphological dynamics in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (2014) 3921-3926.
ŚRobka J.et al.: Comparison study of two programs dedicated to X-ray microtomography data analysis in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 283 (2014) 197-208.
Eggert A.et al.: High-speed in-situ tomography of liquid protein foams in International Journal of Materials Research, 105 (2014) 632-639.